Is looting-to-order ‘just a myth’? Open-source analysis of theft-to-order of cultural property.

Last year, underwater archaeologist Peter Campbell and I blogged about evidence of antiquities looting to order. Over the year, I’ve conducted further research (on which Peter has kindly commented), and I’ve now published an open-source analysis of theft-to-order in (open access) Cogent Social Sciences.

I believe that it is (not the but nonetheless) a standard business model, which has been documented in at least 43 countries, which span South America, North America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia. Notably, it is used in online trafficking of stolen cultural goods by organised criminals and trafficking by armed groups and repressive regimes (conflict antiquities trafficking).

Abstract

Looting-to-order or theft-to-order of cultural assets has been widely dismissed as a myth. To test that, an open-source analysis of cases and testimony from law enforcement agents, perpetrators of cultural property crime and cultural heritage professionals was conducted.
Web searches were conducted for reports that addressed looting, stealing or theft of cultural property on commission or to order; for material that discussed looters, robbers or thieves who had been contracted, employed, hired or paid to extract antiquities; and for academic publications that discussed “looting to order”, “theft to order” or any commodity “stolen to order”.
Source-end employment/contracting that did not demonstrate a direct connection to market-end purchase and other cases that might have constituted “stealing to offer” were excluded, as were implicit and complicit orders that did not establish a contractual relationship.
The analysis found historic and global evidence of commissioned theft of cultural property. It also found evidence that theft-to-order was a significant problem in some places and had served as a structure for conflict antiquities trading in Argentina, Cambodia and Syria. Since it is an exceptionally challenging form of an already difficult-to-police crime, the evidence of theft-to-order reinforces demands for increased market regulation through export and import licensing.

Keywords

conflict antiquities trade; cybercrime; illicit antiquities trade; open-source analysis; organised crime; property crime; theft to order

Citation

Hardy, S A. 2015: “Is looting-to-order ‘just a myth’? Open-source analysis of theft-to-order of cultural property.” Cogent Social Sciences, Volume 1. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2015.1087110

Advertisements

One Comment to “Is looting-to-order ‘just a myth’? Open-source analysis of theft-to-order of cultural property.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: